Growth and L-Systems

Have been reading about l-systems, mostly papers from here. Trying to get segment growth working as described in the growth functions section (1.9) of The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. I don't understand a lot of it but I think I got the basic idea :D. It was really confusing after a certain point when reading about l-systems, they started making a lot more sense when I actually started trying to implement stuff!

The important part is that F is getting rewritten. The g parameter is incremented each time to act as an age attribute, so g is the linear growth, and then length is set by using g in a funky smooth step type function thingy ((-2*g^3)+(3*g^2)) to get a kinda sigmoidal growth.

The b variable is used to control the speed of the growth.

The rest is just for controlling the branching so that the l-system came to some kind of end state. Like the m parameter in A(m) which decays over generations so that it stops getting replaced eventually.

The generation parameter is just set to $F so that every frame is another full generation.

This is the same l-system without rewriting F:

hipnc is here.

Comments

Cloth tear geometry and shading detail

Been adding geo detail to the torn cloth and shading the additional geo. Shading sure is fun! :) Thickness added to the cloth geo Extrude sides are extruded out again The second extrusion is done twice, once for the U direction, and once for the V direction. Polyframe is used to get the UV gradient to extrude along, vopsops are used to move the extrudeFront points after extrusion as you can't control the extrusion per point with just a polyExtrude node... The extrusion is done twice so that the two different surfaces represent the opposing thread directions. since my geometry (and therefore tears) are in line with the U and V direction, the effect is not obvious in this case. The extra geo after shading The .hip file below has a slightly newer shader than in the video and the image above, I removed the part of the shader that created the soft ramp for the alpha edge and used just the thread noise instead; it now looks more like: Slightly newer shader than...

Wire to RBD feedback in DOPs

Normally if a wire is constrained to an RBD, the rbd isn't affected by the wire at all. Which is annoying ... but I had an idea to get it to work. the wire solver can store the internal forces on the geometry. In DOPs I made a point force, the position is set to the position of the constraint and the force is the wire's internal (linear) force. I have put a sopnet in the dopnet to get the wire and the constrained point so I can reference them in the point force. It could be simpler with a python expression to get the position and force directly without going through the sopnet, but this is just a little test... For multiple attachment points, I think a copy data node could be used to copy the point force data for each constrained point ... hip file here Wire to RBD feedback forces from Sam Hancock on Vimeo .

Worm locomotion with FEM

I have always wanted to do a dynamic locomotion setup, I have tried in the past with wire and sop solver with .... interesting results ;) With FEM in Houdini 13, the rest attribute is stored on vertices which allows a tetra to change its rest state independently of the surrounding tetras. With this, parts can be expanded and shrunk to get a muscle type action. I have started with a worm since it is quite simple, the contractions and expansions move back along the worm in a wave, opposing the travel direction. It took quite a bit of tweaking to get him moving at all. One major element of a real worm's action that's missing is the little hairs that grip the ground. I couldn't find a way to change the friction per point so I have gone a bit hacky and multed down v wherever I didn't want the worm to move. I would love to hear if there is a per point friction control! Here is the video Houdini 13 FEM Worm locomotion from Sam Hancock on Vimeo . ...and the .hip is...

I, Houdini

Search This Blog